[ProgClub programming] MIT or GPL
John Elliot V | ProgClub
jj5 at progclub.org
Tue Jun 18 08:29:13 AEST 2019
On 18/6/19 8:20 am, Jedd Rashbrooke wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 07:14, John Elliot V | ProgClub <jj5 at progclub.org
> <mailto:jj5 at progclub.org>> wrote:
> > You may wish to
> > consider: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#Expat
> Many many people refer to the "MIT license"...
> Indeed. 
> I'd hope that most Australians would wrongly refer to it as 'the MIT
> licence', but I suspect you may categorise correct spelling as nit-picking.
ITYM "nitpicking"... lolz.
> I moved to the MIT
> license from the BSD license because I didn't want to make
Well all other things being equal...
> but perhaps I should just use "Apache 2.0" and be done
> with it. Also the AGPL is of interest... if I was gonna go GPL I would
> go AGPL... thoughts?
> What's your actual ethical standpoint on how your code is used,
> propagated, shared, sold, etc?
I'm pretty laissez-faire, but this question was fishing for if I have a
responsibility to free software that I'm perhaps neglecting... staying
with the incumbent requires the least energy...
|_|_|O| Because every programmer needs a good club!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 231 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the programming