Difference between revisions of "Mail filters"

From ProgClub
Jump to: navigation, search
(Love Calculator)
(Web Design Tips for Online Casino Sites)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Vegans - Can That they Always be Successful in Sports?
+
Expert Usability Review vs Usability Testing
 
   
 
   
 +
One question we're often asked will be which method is best: usability testing or expert usability reviews? Well, should they were sports cars, expert usability reviews might be a Porsche (fairly decent car and better than no car at a lot of), but usability testing would end up being in a different league, namely Formula 1.
 
   
 
   
−
There is actually the sole belief that to succeed in sport, you have to to nibble on meat and drink milk. It will be thought by many that vegans won'testosterone have hidden strength or stamina to beat beef eaters. These beliefs are false and based on insufficient knowledge.
+
So, what'utes the difference?
 
   
 
   
−
The 'proof' that'ersus occasionally offered is that there are hardly any vegans who are at the top in sporting endeavours. This is definitely faulty logic which could only become applied if there were a very equal number of vegans to meat eaters.
+
- A great expert usability review is when a usability specialist inspects a website to identify potential usability issues
 
   
 
   
−
There are precious couple of vegans in the world. For being the very best distinct sport you have to the dedication and focus to attain the top when there are so many distractions that could stop you. Not many people have that dedication. You will need the right genes we are able to the rim over your competitors. Very couple of have the right genes that might make them champions.
+
- Usability testing involves getting people coming from the audience to evaluate your site whilst performing tasks
 
   
 
   
−
If there is truly only, say, 1 man in 400 who will be vegan, exactly what are the possibilities that that 1 individual will be the one particular who contains the ruthless dedication and the right genes for the sport they're curious in? What's the chance that they will will have had the right encouragement or influences when young that will carry them into that sport? You would be much reliable betting that a various meats eater would have these things because there are 399 various meats eaters and only 1 vegan. We'd have to pin all our hopes on that 1 vegan to emerge with everything needed to be considered a champion. Your money would become much less hazardous betting that one particular from the 399 meats eaters would have what it takes. It's a numbers online: double the number of vegans and you also'll double the number of vegan champions.
+
These people're very similar in many ways in that both:  
 
   
 
   
−
In the UK there are intended to become about 250,000 vegans out of the population of 62 million. That is truly about 1 man in 240. Some will have been vegan for just a couple months. Some will revert to being meat eaters or lacto-ovo vegetarians. There is truly a very even smaller per cent of vegans in some other countries. It is my guestimate that long-term vegans will be more likely to always be lower than 1 in 400 or even 1 in five-hundred. If you have a number of 400 exactly how many will have the genes becoming a a champion? Very couple of. How lots of that very handful of will have the determination? Very number of. Exactly how a lot of the couple of (of the very number of) will probably be vegan? Most likely not even one particular. More most likely individuals people will be meat eaters. But vegans perform still find a way to turn out to be champions up against dozens of odds. Strange, isn'testosterone it that the still common perception of vegans is actually of weedy, skinny, weak and unhealthy people?
+
- Locate and prioritise usability problems
 
   
 
   
−
There are a handful of vegan champions but exactly why aren'big t there much more if it is really a proper lifestyle? There are so number of vegan champions because there are so handful of vegans. Just how many ginger-haired, left-passed sportsmen called Alphonse are champions? None at almost all. Not because somebody like this is incapable of sporting success but because there are so handful of of them.
+
- Evaluate designs in the context of tasks
 
   
 
   
−
Most top sportspeople are single minded in their pursuit of excellence. They won'testosterone let anything get in the way. They are willing to provide way up family life, friendships and leisure time to focus on training. These are ready to risk their health, because could be seen in the number who are willing to take dangerous overall performance enhancing drugs. These are willing to train to excess to such the extent that their immune techniques are weakened. These people care nothing about the possibility of suffering coming from arthritis in later many years since a result of punishing their body in training and competition.
+
Carry out they will come across the same problems?
 
   
 
   
−
Winning is actually everything to them. They're like fanatics. And, like fanatics, nothing else matters when much when the object of their desire. Compassion for farm creatures is of little importance to them in comparison. As a result, it fanaticism will prevent many individuals who might have turn out to be vegan through doing so because coming from the early age, like everybody, these people have been indoctrinated with the lies that meat and milk are necessary for good health. This kind of lie reduces the number of sports athletes and sportspeople who could end up getting vegan and who could go on to glory in the sporting arena. Being a champion is a lot more important to them than being a vegan. The couple of vegan champions are those types of who don'capital t believe the lies about various meats or those that who put compassion first.  
+
The answer depends on how precisely you measure this, on balance no, not reliably. Most of the time, expert usability reviews tend to find high level breaches of design rules and consistency. Usability testing is better at finding issues related to special domain knowledge and task flows.  
 
   
 
   
−
There are a serious few vegan sportsmen and women who regularly beat meats eaters. I will still only discuss a number of since representatives from the vegan sporting world.  
+
Had you been to transport out a very expert usability review before conducting usability testing, and compare the two sets of findings, you can observe just how the issues you found in comparison with their real experiences. Did you discover a lot of the problems? Which kinds did you overlook? Which kinds that you thought might always be issues switched out not to always be? This unique will provide you a good feel for exactly how expert usability reviews hold up toward usability testing.  
 
   
 
   
−
Mac Danzig won his King with the Cage fighting title while a vegan. You must tough to survive in that type of contest and yet he thrived and prospered.
+
Often, expert reviews will:
 
   
 
   
−
Carl Lewis offers said that his best performances on the driving track came when he had been following a vegan diet.
+
- Ignore usability issues that arise during usability testing
 
   
 
   
−
Scott Jurek may be the quite a few winner of 100-mile races and twice winner from the Badwater Ultra marathon, which will be run over a course of 135 miles. The contest starts in Death Valley, at 280 feet below sea level and finishes at Mount Whitney Portal, which is actually 8.360 feet above sea level. That'ersus a 135 miles course over three mountain ranges with a cumulative ascent of 13,000 feet along with a cumulative descent of 4,700 feet. You require being tough just to think about doing it.
+
- Locate some issues that usability testing didn'capital t
 
   
 
   
−
Brendan Brazier is truly a vegan plus a professional Ironman Triathlete, twice winner in the Canadian Ultra Marathon championship.  
+
- Report false alarms (i.e. not real issues)
 
   
 
   
−
So, it is possible for vegans to end up being world champions in both sprinting and endurance events. But what about strength sports? Can vegans end up being strong? Or can they will always be top bodybuilders? Can they will build upward formidable strength or huge muscle bulk?
+
And that's the problem. Regardless of how good a helpful expert you are if you just count while on an expert usability review you'll come across different types of issues and overlook some potentially serious products.  
 
   
 
   
−
The answer is (you've guessed it): 'it's true!'.  
+
Consider the case of a health website aimed specifically at brand-new mums. The expert usability review found plenty of great issues, but might have missed the main killer one that triggered participants to pass comments like "That'utes just so insensitive!" and "I wouldn'big t use this web site anymore". And just about all because of the seemingly benign bit of banner advertising for a local fitness center placed next to a good post about breasts serving. A reviewer would have difficulty predicting the indignant reaction of brand-new mothers who felt the site was rubbing their nostril in it. In any case there would end up being little potential for them going everywhere near a health club with a newborn.  
 
   
 
   
−
There are many very powerful vegans who train with weights. There are quite a few impressive bodybuilders who have built way up their bulk on vegan diets.
+
How much overlap perhaps there is between expert usability reviews & usability testing?
 
   
 
   
−
But where are all the vegan Olympic weightlifting champions and powerlifting world record holders, then? Where will be the vegan who seems to have won the World'ersus Strongest Man title?
+
Obviously, there is some overlap in the problems present in both expert usability reviews and usability testing. Research executed by Fu, Salvendy and Turley in 2002 estimated this kind of to end up being around 41%. Not as high since you might expect. Interestingly, expert usability reviews tend to discover far more troubles in comparison with usability testing. But it'utes quality over variety.
 
   
 
   
−
Provide it time. Like I said above, there aren'big t sufficient vegans through whose ranks these people can emerge. It will happen. It is truly happening.  
+
Expert usability reviews are good...  
 
   
 
   
−
There are two vegan strength champions who arrive at mind, though. Both women. Pat Reeves - she's a world class powerlifter. Many times the United kingdom powerlifting champion. And Jane Black olympic weight lifter who seems to have set data in masters' training events.  
+
Expert usability reviews are more common than usability testing mainly because these people're more affordable and quicker to carry out. Typically, it'll only have a number of days and nights to inspect a site and write a report and because you don'capital t need to pay labs nor recruit people, charges are significantly cheaper. Due to this, that they're often preferred to usability testing, certain when time and budget are squeezed.  
 
   
 
   
−
What about the men? Perhaps as well many male strength sports athletes are worried about not getting sufficient of their usual slaughterhouse products. Yet again, offer it time for the facts to get them. There are many vegans in training, as might be seen in the vegan fitness and bodybuilding forums. Wait right up until they start to achieve more success then the timid various meats eaters will see that they have nothing to fear in giving upward the meat and milk that their mummies told them they had to consume to grow upward big and full. They will realise that real men don'n need you can eat beef.  
+
There are anyhow some pitfalls. For a start, a lot depends on the reviewer'utes level of experience. No two usability experts will locate exactly the same issues so the method is actually furthermore available to practitioner variation. The biggest problem nevertheless is simply that they will occasionally ignore the real troubles that cause users to fail tasks. This might be specifically true once the customers seems to have a particular skill set. For illustration, a helpful accountant may always be better placed to diagnose selected types of issues related to online accountancy tasks than a non-accountant reviewer.  
 
   
 
   
−
What about vegan bodybuilders? Till a very several years ago there weren'testosterone any special dietary supplements for vegan bodybuilders. Various meats eaters were spoilt for choice but vegans had no choice because there wasn't anything to select. Very few bodybuilders depend on just normal food. They take health supplements in the form of powders and supplements. And many (most pro kinds?) take dangerous and against the law drugs. A large amount of them have muscle tissue that are partly the item with the chemistry lab. Any person who could create huge muscle groups on a beef-based diet could perform so on a vegan diet.  
+
...But usability testing is truly da Daddy!
 
   
 
   
−
Not everyone can grow competition-winning muscle tissues. Again, the vegan who does so must have the right genes. And the time and dedication. He has to be that rare individual who just happens to have almost all the right characteristics. Not much chance that there are many vegans who are individuals. Far more probable that one coming from the huge bulk of meat eaters will have what is essential. You tend to be more probably to find a top athlete or a Nobel Prize Winner in Scotland than on the Isle of Man. Not because the Scots are inherently superior to the Manx people. But because there are more of them.  
+
Usability testing takes far more time to program and organise and is much more expensive also - recruiting and incentivising people through a audience may be costly. But it's definitely worth the effort! The results provide a truer picture from the real troubles people encounter because that they're derived coming from real consumers in the first place.  
 
   
 
   
−
Don'capital t believe the lies with the vested appeals to in the meat and milk industries. These people have invested intensively in cruelty and they also need to remain the people convinced that the slaughter and abuse of their victims is necessary for the continued health of humans.  
+
It'ersus inconceivable exactly how sites go stay without checking to determine that that they're actually usable. It'utes like building an automobile but not test driving it. "All right, we've built this kind of great website. Umm, well no, we've not looked at to determine if people can play with it yet. But don'testosterone worry because most the links function and the pages download quickly."
 
   
 
   
−
Believe instead the many healthy, hard and fit vegans who daily prove exactly how healthy the vegan diet is actually. There's nothing humans need that can't be obtained from a well balanced vegan diet. A vegan diet is actually well suited for humans of every single age, since the American Dietetic Association and Dietitians of Canada acknowledge.  
+
Another plus of usability testing is truly that there'ersus significantly less conjecture and feedback comes straight through the horse'utes mouth. Movies of user sessions in particular, offers a powerful persuasion resource for reluctant stakeholders. It's hard to argue with recordings of people in tears of frustration.  
 
   
 
   
−
For more info about veganism and every single one its own benefits, pls visit http://www.thesaucyvegan.com where you'll find helpful and informed people who is going to be grateful to share their knowledge with you.
+
Use real users and accept no substitute!
 
   
 
   
−
http://bookmarkname.com/search.php?search=http://stayvegan.com
+
Both expert usability reviews and usability testing have their time and place. In practice, people often use expert usability reviews early on straighten way up their design in arrangements for usability testing. (Indeed this is critical for accessibility testing, since it's a waste of your time to recruit and test subscribers who can'n even get into your site in the first place.)
 +
 +
Whilst a helpful expert usability review will be better than nothing, it'utes still vital to serve your website in front of people since early since possible way too, prefer to than leaving it also late. Key elements such since site structure and navigation should be assessed with surfers at the original opportunity. Otherwise you risk having your site considerably overhauled at a late stage.
 +
 +
Ultimately, the key should be to appreciate that expert usability reviews and usability testing are different beasts. The most efficient approach should be to try and integrate both techniques. Remember though, you must test your site with real surfers - accept no substitute!
 +
http://www.cactusteachers.com/member/9555/

Revision as of 20:05, 28 June 2012

Expert Usability Review vs Usability Testing

One question we're often asked will be which method is best: usability testing or expert usability reviews? Well, should they were sports cars, expert usability reviews might be a Porsche (fairly decent car and better than no car at a lot of), but usability testing would end up being in a different league, namely Formula 1.

So, what'utes the difference?

- A great expert usability review is when a usability specialist inspects a website to identify potential usability issues

- Usability testing involves getting people coming from the audience to evaluate your site whilst performing tasks

These people're very similar in many ways in that both:

- Locate and prioritise usability problems

- Evaluate designs in the context of tasks

Carry out they will come across the same problems?

The answer depends on how precisely you measure this, on balance no, not reliably. Most of the time, expert usability reviews tend to find high level breaches of design rules and consistency. Usability testing is better at finding issues related to special domain knowledge and task flows.

Had you been to transport out a very expert usability review before conducting usability testing, and compare the two sets of findings, you can observe just how the issues you found in comparison with their real experiences. Did you discover a lot of the problems? Which kinds did you overlook? Which kinds that you thought might always be issues switched out not to always be? This unique will provide you a good feel for exactly how expert usability reviews hold up toward usability testing.

Often, expert reviews will:

- Ignore usability issues that arise during usability testing

- Locate some issues that usability testing didn'capital t

- Report false alarms (i.e. not real issues)

And that's the problem. Regardless of how good a helpful expert you are if you just count while on an expert usability review you'll come across different types of issues and overlook some potentially serious products.

Consider the case of a health website aimed specifically at brand-new mums. The expert usability review found plenty of great issues, but might have missed the main killer one that triggered participants to pass comments like "That'utes just so insensitive!" and "I wouldn'big t use this web site anymore". And just about all because of the seemingly benign bit of banner advertising for a local fitness center placed next to a good post about breasts serving. A reviewer would have difficulty predicting the indignant reaction of brand-new mothers who felt the site was rubbing their nostril in it. In any case there would end up being little potential for them going everywhere near a health club with a newborn.

How much overlap perhaps there is between expert usability reviews & usability testing?

Obviously, there is some overlap in the problems present in both expert usability reviews and usability testing. Research executed by Fu, Salvendy and Turley in 2002 estimated this kind of to end up being around 41%. Not as high since you might expect. Interestingly, expert usability reviews tend to discover far more troubles in comparison with usability testing. But it'utes quality over variety.

Expert usability reviews are good...

Expert usability reviews are more common than usability testing mainly because these people're more affordable and quicker to carry out. Typically, it'll only have a number of days and nights to inspect a site and write a report and because you don'capital t need to pay labs nor recruit people, charges are significantly cheaper. Due to this, that they're often preferred to usability testing, certain when time and budget are squeezed.

There are anyhow some pitfalls. For a start, a lot depends on the reviewer'utes level of experience. No two usability experts will locate exactly the same issues so the method is actually furthermore available to practitioner variation. The biggest problem nevertheless is simply that they will occasionally ignore the real troubles that cause users to fail tasks. This might be specifically true once the customers seems to have a particular skill set. For illustration, a helpful accountant may always be better placed to diagnose selected types of issues related to online accountancy tasks than a non-accountant reviewer.

...But usability testing is truly da Daddy!

Usability testing takes far more time to program and organise and is much more expensive also - recruiting and incentivising people through a audience may be costly. But it's definitely worth the effort! The results provide a truer picture from the real troubles people encounter because that they're derived coming from real consumers in the first place.

It'ersus inconceivable exactly how sites go stay without checking to determine that that they're actually usable. It'utes like building an automobile but not test driving it. "All right, we've built this kind of great website. Umm, well no, we've not looked at to determine if people can play with it yet. But don'testosterone worry because most the links function and the pages download quickly."

Another plus of usability testing is truly that there'ersus significantly less conjecture and feedback comes straight through the horse'utes mouth. Movies of user sessions in particular, offers a powerful persuasion resource for reluctant stakeholders. It's hard to argue with recordings of people in tears of frustration.

Use real users and accept no substitute!

Both expert usability reviews and usability testing have their time and place. In practice, people often use expert usability reviews early on straighten way up their design in arrangements for usability testing. (Indeed this is critical for accessibility testing, since it's a waste of your time to recruit and test subscribers who can'n even get into your site in the first place.)

Whilst a helpful expert usability review will be better than nothing, it'utes still vital to serve your website in front of people since early since possible way too, prefer to than leaving it also late. Key elements such since site structure and navigation should be assessed with surfers at the original opportunity. Otherwise you risk having your site considerably overhauled at a late stage.

Ultimately, the key should be to appreciate that expert usability reviews and usability testing are different beasts. The most efficient approach should be to try and integrate both techniques. Remember though, you must test your site with real surfers - accept no substitute! http://www.cactusteachers.com/member/9555/

Retrieved from "https://www.progclub.org/wiki/mediawiki/index.php?title=Mail_filters&oldid=3251"